I never know how to start a post so I'm just going to dive right in:
I gave a presentation yesterday that I hadn't looked at for a week and a half due to being out of town. Were you on vacation, Kaitlyn? (you might ask) Well unless you call leading a cabin of 10 middle school girls vacation than no, I was not. It was actually an anti-vacation. But loads of fun and productive, just not restful/ peaceful/ rejuvenating or anything like that.
Anyways, my presentation, it was on my results! Which is good, and my point, that I got results last last Thursday and was somewhat able to interpret them and get reasonable answers! Problem is that the ways to test for results are somewhat ambiguous but for now I'm fine with them since they at least don't scream "YOU'RE DOING EVERYTHING WRONG!"... They could just being saying "Hey you don't know what I mean". I feel like its fairly obvious that you're tired when you think results are actually speaking to you.
So the results that I'm looking for include but are not limited to:
- Orthogonally tilted pores
- Accessible pores
- Pore size around 5 nm
- Thickness of the film around 240 nm
So to test the orthogonality of the pores we use X-ray Diffraction or XRD but the expected results are no results. This is what I'm talking about:
![]() |
H.W.Hillhouse et. al. Micropor. Mesopor. Materials 2001 44-45: 639 |
We can see that for the first example with the perpendicular pores the related intensity has no peaks. However no peaks can mean perpendicular pores (which is what we want) or it could mean complete disordering to the pores (which is not what we want)! Clearly there is a problem.
Now to test the accessibility of the pores and to also get a pore size I did a flux test using ethanol and this nice little setup:
![]() |
The membrane is inserted between the clamp above |
![]() |
Right: Vacuum Pump with adjustable pressures in order to obtain a linear relationship Left: Filtration setup to filter ethanol through the membrane setup on the top |
I was able to obtain a flux which is good... or bad, once again. It could be good because it could mean that the pores are accessible, however it could be bad since it could mean there is just a crack letting the ethanol through. But I got a pore size around the size of what the literature had as well so fingers crossed!
This week we will be attempting to create more solid and less ambiguous ways of characterizing the membranes so we can attempt to recover proteins from them.